Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603975›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The effectiveness of explainable AI on human factors in trust models.

Justin C Cheung, Shirley S Ho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin C CheungWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore, 637718, Singapore.
Shirley S HoWee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, 31 Nanyang Link, Singapore, 637718, Singapore. tsyho@ntu.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable AI has garnered significant traction in science communication research. Prior empirical studies have firmly established that explainable AI communication could improve trust in AI and that trust in AI engineers was argued to be an under-explored dimension of trust. In this vein, trust in AI engineers was also found to be a factor in determining public perceptions and acceptance. Thus, a key question emerges: Can explainable AI improve trust in AI engineers? In this study, we set out to investigate the effects of explainability perception on trust in AI engineers, while accounting for trust in AI system. More concretely, through a public opinion survey in Singapore (N = 1,002), structural equation modelling analyses revealed that perceived explainability significantly shaped all trust in AI engineers' dimensions (i.e., ability, benevolence, and integrity). Results also revealed that trust in the ability of AI engineers subsequently shaped people's attitude and intention to use various types of autonomous passenger drones (i.e., tourism/daily commute/cross-country/city travel). Several serial mediation pathways through trust in ability and attitude were identified between explainability perception and use intention. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceTrustAdultCommunicationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPublic OpinionSingaporeSurveys and QuestionnairesExplainabilityExplainable AITrust in AITrust in AI engineersUncertainty reduction theoryXAI

Identifiers

PMID40603975
PMCPMC12223004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.