Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603967›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

WeedSwin hierarchical vision transformer with SAM-2 for multi-stage weed detection and classification.

Taminul Islam, Toqi Tahamid Sarker, Khaled R Ahmed, Cristiana Bernardi Rankrape, Karla Gage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taminul IslamSchool of Computing, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA. taminul.islam@siu.edu.
Toqi Tahamid SarkerSchool of Computing, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA.
Khaled R AhmedSchool of Computing, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA.
Cristiana Bernardi RankrapeSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA.
Karla GageSchool of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL, 62901, USA.

Funding

Illinois Innovation Network 24-21-226695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weed detection and classification using computer vision and deep learning techniques have emerged as crucial tools for precision agriculture, offering automated solutions for sustainable farming practices. This study presents a comprehensive approach to weed identification across multiple growth stages, addressing the challenges of detecting and classifying diverse weed species throughout their developmental cycles. We introduce two extensive datasets: the Alpha Weed Dataset (AWD) with 203,567 images and the Beta Weed Dataset (BWD) with 120,341 images, collectively documenting 16 prevalent weed species across 11 growth stages. The datasets were preprocessed using both traditional computer vision techniques and the advanced SAM-2 model, ensuring high-quality annotations with segmentation masks and precise bounding boxes. Our research evaluates several state-of-the-art object detection architectures, including DINO Transformer (with ResNet-101 and Swin backbones), Detection Transformer (DETR), EfficientNet B4, YOLO v8, and RetinaNet. Additionally, we propose a novel WeedSwin Transformer architecture specifically designed to address the unique challenges of weed detection, such as complex morphological variations and overlapping vegetation patterns. Through rigorous experimentation, WeedSwin demonstrated superior performance, achieving 0.993 ± 0.004 mAP and 0.985 mAR while maintaining practical processing speeds of 218.27 FPS, outperforming existing architectures across various metrics. The comprehensive evaluation across different growth stages reveals the robustness of our approach, particularly in detecting challenging "driver weeds" that significantly impact agricultural productivity. By providing accurate, automated weed identification capabilities, this research establishes a foundation for more efficient and environmentally sustainable weed management practices. The demonstrated success of the WeedSwin architecture, combined with our extensive temporal datasets, represents a significant advancement in agricultural computer vision, supporting the evolution of precision farming techniques while promoting reduced herbicide usage and improved crop management efficiency.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedPlant WeedsAgricultureDeep LearningWeed ControlObject detectionPrecision agricultureSam2Weed classificationWeed detectionWeed growth stage

Identifiers

PMID40603967
PMCPMC12222661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.