Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603931›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Validated low-cost standardized VICON configuration as a practical approach to estimating the minimal accuracy of a specific setup.

Adam Chromy, Petr Sopak, Hynek Cigler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adam ChromyCEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 656/123, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic. chromy@vut.cz.
Petr SopakCEITEC-Central European Institute of Technology, Brno University of Technology, Purkynova 656/123, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
Hynek CiglerPsychology Research Institute, Faculty of Social Sciences, Masaryk University, Jostova 10, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic.

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 857306Technology Agency of the Czech Republic TQ03000946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motion Capture (MoCap) is rapidly growing in the sports, biomechanics, healthcare, and medicine segments, where accuracy is crucial. Current research studies are concurrently confirming that the accuracy can be determined only for the specific analyzed configuration and thus recommending performing your own accuracy verification on your specific setup. However, it is often hard to perform since it requires significant effort, time, knowledge of statistical data analysis and often equipment and tools that are not commonly available. This paper deals with this by creating a standardized setup with carefully evaluated accuracy, substituting the on-site validation process (in case of using such a setup) or providing the worst-case accuracy (when a more advanced setup is used). The setup is designed to be low-cost, easily reproducible and cover a wide range of applications - thus VICON setup with five VERO v1.3 cameras is used. The accuracy was evaluated using the robotic manipulator EPSON C3, determining that the absolute positioning accuracy of such a standardized setup is 0.65 mm on average (SD = 0.48, with maximal error of 2.47 mm) and rotation accuracy 0.40° (SD = 0.35, with maximal error of 2.0°), which is negligible considering the experimental diameter of 1.4 m and full angular span. The major source of error was specific to particular spatial and rotational positions; other systematic and other random errors were noticeably smaller. If the standardized setup is used and all its requirements are met, a similar accuracy as validated above can be expected without the need to explicitly validate the specific configuration, which is time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Indexed as

Accuracy assessmentMotion captureStandardizationValidationVICON

Identifiers

PMID40603931
PMCPMC12223194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.