ArticleScientific reports2025
False-positive tolerant model misconduct mitigation in distributed federated learning on electronic health record data across clinical institutions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As collaborative Machine Learning on cross-institutional, fully distributed networks become an important tool in predictive health modeling, its inherent security risks must be addressed. One among such risks is the lack of a mitigation strategy against injections of tampered models (or "model misconduct") into the collaborative pipeline, without excessive false alarms. We propose a false-positive tolerant methodology to preserve model integrity and mitigate the impacts of adversarial misconduct in a Federated Learning scenario. Our method grants false-positive detection leeway as each participating site would be quarantined only when their misbehavior allowance (or "budget") is exhausted, preventing over-ostracization and the subsequent loss of sample size. We evaluated our system on a decentralized blockchain network with three datasets. Our method demonstrated gains of 0.058-0.121 Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve when compared to the solution without false-positive tolerance, with negligible overhead (< 12 milliseconds). Our method can serve as an efficient and robust approach to safeguard the distributed Federated Learning process in collaborative healthcare, inheriting blockchain's characteristics of transparency and decentralization. Future work can apply our methodology to more sophisticated machine learning algorithms or scale the experiments in a large-scale learning scenario with more participating sites and larger sample sizes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.