ArticleScientific data2025
Consistently processed RNA sequencing data from 50 sources enriched for pediatric data.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging Dog Models to Uncover Human Cancer Insights.Research square · 2026Article
- The Paipu framework enables creation of a large-scale mammalian cancer transcriptomics atlas.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Larger cohorts improve the power of tumor gene expression analysis, but the signal is muddied if datasets are processed using different methods or have inaccurate metadata. Here we present five compendia containing consistently processed gene expression data derived from 16,446 diverse RNA sequencing datasets. To create the compendia, we obtained access to RNA sequence data from repositories containing public data as well as clinical partners with access to non-published data. We then assessed the quality, quantified gene expression, harmonized clinical metadata, and released the expression values and metadata without access restrictions. These datasets have been used for diverse projects ranging from identifying similarities between tumor types to assessing how well cell lines recapitulate tumors. They have also been used for n-of-1 analysis to identify genes with unusual expression patterns in a single sample and to infer molecular diagnosis. The comparison to new data is enabled by our dockerized, freely available pipeline. The compendia have been cited in at least 20 publications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.