Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603878›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The importance of clays in speleothem magnetic remanence acquisition.

Rashida Doctor, Joshua M Feinberg, Plinio Jaqueto, Ricardo Trindade, Janine A Carmo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rashida DoctorInstitute for Rock Magnetism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA. docto005@umn.edu.
Joshua M FeinbergInstitute for Rock Magnetism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Plinio JaquetoInstitute for Rock Magnetism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 55455, USA.
Ricardo TrindadeDepartment of Geophysics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-070, Brazil.
Janine A CarmoDepartment of Geophysics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, 05508-070, Brazil.

Funding

Division of Earth Sciences 2044535
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speleothems are promising recorders of paleosecular variation of the Earth's magnetic field, but ambiguities remain about the physical processes active during remanence acquisition. Speleothems have been used to determine relative paleointensity using classical methods for sedimentary materials. We created artificial speleothems by precipitating a solution of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate mixed with varying ratios of magnetite and kaolinite clay. These experiments were carried out over a range of Earth-like field intensities ranging from 15 to 70 [Formula: see text], allowing us to determine the conditions that maximize field sensitivity. We find that our artificial speleothems are good recorders of direction except for samples grown at low applied field strengths ([Formula: see text]) with a high magnetite to clay ratios (1:4). At any given field strength, more clay resulted in lower alignment efficiencies. Field sensitivity, or the amount of variation in the alignment efficiencies over the range of applied field strengths, was maximized for an intermediate ratio of magnetite to clay and nonlinear for the range of experimental and model parameters tested. The mechanism of speleothem remanence acquisition can be described by a two-step process: flocculate moment alignment with the field and flocculate-substrate interactions (FSIs). These findings have important implications for speleothem relative paleointensity studies since the delivery of detrital material within drip waters varies over time, causing a speleothem's alignment efficiency to fluctuate.

Indexed as

FlocculationPaleointensitySpeleothem magnetism

Identifiers

PMID40603878
PMCPMC12223129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.