ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2025
The Dissectionality of Care in the U.S.: A Scoping Review in Healthcare of Implicit Bias, Perceived Discrimination, and Minority Stress Among Sexual and Gender Minorities.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Contributing to Discriminatory Nursing Care: A Qualitative Study From Nurses' Experiences.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Urological care for sexual and gender minorities: a narrative review toward equitable care.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- Shadows of Fear: How Pandemic Uncertainty Fuels LGBTQ+ Targeted Violence.Archives of sexual behavior · 2026Article
- Bias at the Bedside: A Comprehensive Review of Racial, Sexual, and Gender Minority Experiences and Provider Attitudes in Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Changes in gender-affirming care, reproductive rights, and healthcare within the USA result in greater inequities and disparities. This scoping review is the first to study the emerging literature of sexual and gender minorities (SGM) when navigating healthcare systems as it relates to the constructs of implicit bias, perceived discrimination, and minority stress. This review examines patient and provider interactions and how the above constructs impact healthcare access, the quality of care received, and clinical outcomes for patients within the framework of intersectionality and positionality. Database searches yielded 96 articles published between January 2015 and January 2025. Reviewed research included systematic literature reviews, mixed methods designs, and qualitative and quantitative designs studies which were conducted in the USA and based on various sexual groups and gender diverse populations who accessed medical or behavioral healthcare treatments. Research quality appraisal was conducted through the Crowe critical appraisal tool. Conceptual overlap between implicit bias, perceived discrimination, and minority stress was found. Medical decision-making and health outcomes during provider and patient interactions were further evaluated based on these concepts. Further research and interventions directed at more inclusive medical and behavioral healthcare for SGM populations are needed. We propose the term dissectionality of care, focusing attention on the gaps within healthcare settings in illustrating the multidirectional and multilayered intersections between patient and provider interactions. Barriers to care experienced by historically disadvantaged and under-resourced sexual and gender diverse patients and providers were found. We suggest ways to enhance professional curricula and direct further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40603819What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.