Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603810›Full record

ReviewThe patient2025

Seven Actions Towards Advancing Patient Authorship and Collaboration in Peer-Reviewed Publications.

Trishna Bharadia, Jan Geissler, Rosie Robson, Lucie Laštíková, Laura D Porter, Grace Richmond, Ben Johnson, Louise Roch, Dikran Toroser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The patient, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Trishna BharadiaPatient Author, The Spark Global, Buckinghamshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3633-729X
Jan GeisslerPatient Author, Patvocates, Riemerling, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9058-5097
Rosie RobsonAshfield MedComms, An Inizio Company, Manchester, UK. rosie.robson@ashfieldmedcomms.com.ORCID 0009-0000-2043-7902
Lucie LaštíkováPatient Author, Patient Advocate and Chairwoman of Pacienti IBD, Prague, Czech Republic.
Laura D PorterPatient Author, Independent Patient Advocate, Cheverly, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4068-1950
Grace RichmondGSK, London, UK.
Ben JohnsonMEDiSTRAVA, An Inizio Company, London, Midlands, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-5817-5945
Louise RochBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Biberach, Germany.
Dikran ToroserUniversity of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3480-9946

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partnerships between patients and the medical research community are strengthening. Patient involvement in research processes through collaborative workstreams provides authentic insights and perspectives, enhances trust between stakeholders and the patient community, brings balance to authorship groups and adds value and contextualisation to publications. Here, patient advocates, representatives from patient and caregiver communities and pharmaceutical and medical communications professionals propose seven actions to advance patient authorship and collaboration in peer-reviewed publications. Drawing on research, personal experience and professional insight, they call for a shift in conventional publication development practices-from seeking reasons to include patient authors to requiring justification for their exclusion-thereby facilitating greater inclusion and representation of the patient voice. The authors advocate moving beyond the concept of 'patient-centricity' towards 'patient partnership' to reflect a collaborative approach and more equitable balance of power and benefits among stakeholders. They also emphasise the importance of involving patients holistically in publication steering committees to ensure that the publication landscape includes patient perspectives and represents lived experiences. Continued facilitation and strengthening of partnerships between patient and non-patient authors is noted as essential for improving communication, understanding and equity within authorship groups. To support the visibility and recognition of patient authors, they recommend the use of the 'patient author' affiliation metatag to better identify, search, filter and standardise publications with patient involvement, identify patient authors and help build an evidence base from which best practice and guidance can be developed. Additionally, the authors highlight the need to consider and develop guidance around compensation of patient authors to acknowledge the contribution and time commitments across the research process and enable greater diversity, equity and inclusion. Finally, they stress the importance of extending the reach of publications to wider audiences through enhanced accessibility formats and open access.

Indexed as

AuthorshipBiomedical ResearchCooperative BehaviorPatient ParticipationPeer Review, ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID40603810
PMCPMC12408705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.