ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025
Oral and Intravenous Iron Therapy.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cadmium, Iron Deficiency Anemia and Hypophosphatemic Osteomalacia Due to Intravenous Iron Supplementation.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Iron deficiency without anemia: An underrecognized and undertreated clinical condition with special focus on colorectal cancer.Clinical hematology international · 2026Review
- Daily versus alternate-day oral iron in women with iron deficiency anemia: impact of dosing schedule and adherence on hemoglobin recovery.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-anemic iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia are the most common health conditions. They are mostly caused by blood loss and/or inadequate dietary iron absorption and are managed with iron replacement therapy. The goal of iron replacement therapy is to correct anemia and replenish iron stores. In most patients, oral iron is typically the first choice for treatment due to its ease of use, over-the-counter availability, and low cost of most common formulations. Ferrous sulfate remains the gold standard for oral iron therapy, but alternative formulations have also been developed. Effective iron repletion requires the daily intake of up to 200 mg elemental iron for 3-12 weeks. However, only a small fraction of it gets absorbed. Thus, accumulation of unabsorbed iron in the intestinal lumen may cause constipation and other gastrointestinal side effects. Intravenous iron is the preferred treatment for patients who are intolerant or refractory to oral iron or require rapid correction of anemia and repletion of iron stores, for example prior to surgery. The newest formulations such as ferric carboxymaltose and ferric derisomaltose have excellent safety profiles and can be provided at high doses of 500-1000 mg in a single infusion. Intravenous iron should always be administered in medical facilities by healthcare providers trained to manage potential but rare hypersensitivity reactions. Moreover, phosphate levels should be monitored in patients because intravenous iron formulations, especially ferric carboxymaltose, have been associated with increased risk for hypophosphatemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40603803What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.