Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603777›Full record

ReviewPharmacoEconomics - open2025

Missing Pieces of the Puzzle to Address Market Failures for Antibiotics: Delinked Payment Systems and Insurance Value.

Neil Hawkins, Adrian Towse, Amanda Adler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PharmacoEconomics - open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neil HawkinsHealth Economics & Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.
Adrian TowseOffice of Health Economics, London, United Kingdom.
Amanda AdlerDiabetic Medicine and Health Policy, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. amanda.adler@dtu.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-3385

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Too few companies develop new antibiotics because of the threat of market failure. To address this, a 'delinked' payment, distinct from the usual payment model for drugs, makes payments to manufacturers that do not depend on the volume of antibiotic prescribed. A delinked system removes incentives to overpromote antibiotic use. If total payments are high enough, this system should provide incentives for manufacturers to develop new antibiotics. This assumes that using antibiotics remains consistent with antimicrobial stewardship, a coordinated approach to prescribing antimicrobials responsibly. A delinked system can address market failure that occurs when a disproportionate degree of clinical benefit from a new antibiotic occurs after patent protection ends, reducing the 'reward' to the innovator. Determining value in a delinked payment system requires that the health service estimates the lifetime value of an antimicrobial product, and then decides what proportion of that value to include. These values depend in part on 'STEDI' values including the 'insurance' value new antibiotics would offer in reducing society's risk of major health loss from possible future major episodes of antibiotic resistance. Estimating insurance value requires estimating the health consequences of catastrophic outcomes. Payments in a delinked system can incorporate an 'insurance premium'. We use the example of the UK's delinked payment scheme to illustrate issues and solutions.

Identifiers

PMID40603777
PMCPMC12401795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.