ArticleScientific reports2025
SMOTE algorithm optimization and application in corporate credit risk prediction with diversification strategy consideration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Against the backdrop of dynamic transformations in the financial sector and prominent corporate diversification trends, credit risk prediction becomes significantly more challenging. On one hand, this study focuses on optimizing the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) algorithm for corporate credit risk prediction, thereby enhancing financial institutions' risk management capabilities. The study systematically examines corporate diversification strategies, revealing discrepancies between theoretical frameworks and practical implementations. These strategies complicate corporate financial structures, generating divergent profitability, capital allocation, and risk profiles across business units. Such heterogeneity leads to uneven resource distribution, ultimately impacting enterprise operations, debt servicing capacity, and credit performance. Consequently, financial institutions increasingly prioritize cross-sectoral risk monitoring, business synergy evaluation, and dynamic financial tracking. On the other hand, regarding algorithmic innovation, this study conducts an in-depth analysis of SMOTE's fundamental principles, encompassing its sample generation mechanics and optimized variants. Especially in terms of optimization content, this study innovatively introduces an adaptive boundary adjustment mechanism that automatically defines minority class boundaries based on data distribution characteristics. Meanwhile, it precisely targets critical oversampling areas while avoiding arbitrary sample generation in irrelevant regions. Moreover, an optimized weight allocation protocol during synthetic sample creation incorporates feature relevance and class distribution to produce more representative new samples. The experimental framework utilizes four benchmark datasets: German Credit, Australian Credit Approval, Taiwan Credit Card Default, and Corporate Credit Risk Assessment. The rigorous methodology ensures research validity through scientific data partitioning, appropriate hardware configuration, an advanced software environment, and comprehensive evaluation indices (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score). The study mainly focuses on two aspects. One is to analyze corporate diversification strategy; the other is to explore the optimization of the SMOTE algorithm and its application in credit risk prediction. Empirical results demonstrate the optimized SMOTE algorithm's superiority over six comparison models, such as random over-sampling, under-sampling, etc. The accuracy rate is improved by more than 21%, and the highest is close to 38%. Precision is enhanced by over 28%, peak nearly 35%; Recall is increased by more than 31% and peaked at 42%; F1 score is boosted by approximately 33%, with a maximum of about 39%. This study provides financial institutions with an advanced algorithmic solution for credit risk assessment in diversified corporate environments. Also, it is expected to improve decision-making accuracy, strengthen risk resilience, and promote financial market stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.