Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603676›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Synthesis and olfactory evaluation of (±)-β-irone.

Shigekazu Yamazaki, Makoto Miyazaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The GenusPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shigekazu YamazakiAntianti Co., Ltd., 5-8 Hatago, Toyama, Toyama, 930-0069, Japan. s-yamazk@antianti.com.
Makoto MiyazakiAntianti Co., Ltd., 5-8 Hatago, Toyama, Toyama, 930-0069, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The powdery scent of orris root oil adds elegance and depth to any fragrance. However, orris root oil is one of the most expensive essential oils due to a lengthy six-year production process. If compounds with the powdery scent could be supplied by chemical synthesis at a lower cost than natural products, there would be a large demand. In the course of our research into the synthesis and olfactory evaluation of irone isomers, we found that (±)-β-irone, a minor component of orris root oil, has an excellent powdery aroma. In this study, we report a new synthetic method for (±)-β-irone and the results of its olfactory evaluation. The synthesis of (±)-β-irone was accomplished using commercially available 3-methylcyclohexanone as the starting material. The olfactory evaluation of synthesized (±)-β-irone was performed. (±)-β-Irone has been found to have a strong, transparent, fruity green top note, a rich violet floral heart note, and a clear, powerful, and long-lasting powdery last note with a woody odor. We considered that some part of the powdery fragrance of orris root oil originates from β-irone, and that β-irone is an excellent flavoring and fragrance material that can be used as a substitute for natural orris root oil.

Indexed as

OdorantsOils, VolatilePlant OilsSmellHumansMaleNorisoprenoidsPlant Rootsbeta-iononeNorisoprenoidsOils, VolatilePlant OilsOlfactory evaluationOrris root oilPowdery fragranceSynthesis(±)-β-Irone

Identifiers

PMID40603676
PMCPMC12223088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.