Observational studyJournal of neurology2025
Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide and ocrelizumab on smoldering activity in multiple sclerosis: an observational study in the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Cohort.
Observational study in Journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incidence of Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) under platform disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Anti-CD20 Drugs and Natalizumab Confer Equal Protection Against Progression Independent of Relapse Activity (PIRA) in People With Multiple Sclerosis.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies versus teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Article
- Treatment Effects on Chronic Active Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Building Towards Initiation, Moderation, De-Escalation and Cessation of Disease-Modifying Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis in Greece: An Expert Panel Consensus Meeting.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Smoldering neuroinflammation in progressive multiple sclerosis: mechanisms, imaging biomarkers, and therapeutic opportunities.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Progression-related outcomes of teriflunomide in multiple sclerosis clinical trials.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to compare the effects of teriflunomide and ocrelizumab on clinical and MRI endpoints related to smoldering activity in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).
methodsIn this observational, longitudinal, multicenter study, we included 128 people with RRMS (pwRRMS) treated with teriflunomide and 495 treated with ocrelizumab. Outcomes included time to progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA). In a subset, we also assessed brain volume loss (BVL), longitudinal changes in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics, and the burden of paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs). Propensity score matching was used for between-group comparisons.
resultsOver a median follow-up of 3.1 years in the ocrelizumab group and 1.9 years in the teriflunomide group, there were no significant differences in the risk of PIRA (HR for teriflunomide vs. ocrelizumab: 0.80 [95%-CI:0.40-1.60]; p = 0.53). PwRRMS treated with teriflunomide exhibited lower annualized rates of BVL (-0.80 [95%-CI: -0.91; -0.69] vs. -1.06 [95%-CI: -1.25; -0.86]; p = 0.025) and gray matter volume loss (-0.92 [95%-CI: -1.05; -0.79] vs. -1.20 [95%-CI: -1.43; -0.97]; p = 0.035). No differences were observed in DTI metrics or PRL count.
conclusionsThis real-world study suggests that teriflunomide shows similar efficacy to ocrelizumab on smoldering activity, with a potentially greater effect in reducing BVL. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and understand their long-term implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.