ArticleSurgery today2025
Association of visceral fat with unresectable/recurrent gastric cancer patients following chemotherapy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Article in Surgery today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Gastric Cancer Metastases to the Small and Large Intestines: Hidden Small Intestinal Lesions and Colonic-Mimicking Metastases.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo clarify the association between visceral fat and the prognosis in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer following chemotherapy.
methodsA total of 118 patients were retrospectively analyzed and categorized into high- and low-visceral fat index (VFI) groups, using a cutoff value of 46.5 cm
resultsAfter matching, the high-VFI group demonstrated a significantly better OS and PFS than the low-VFI group. The ORR (40.6% vs. 15.6%, P = 0.026) and DCR (90.6% vs. 67.7%, P = 0.025) were significantly higher in the high-VFI group than the low-VFI group. The high-VFI group also showed a better nutritional status, longer S-1-based chemotherapy duration, higher transition rates to second-/third-line therapy, and fewer adverse events than the low-VFI group. A multivariate analysis identified VFI loss and target lesions (peritoneal and liver) as independent predictors of the OS, whereas VFI loss and target/non-target lesions were predictors of the PFS.
conclusionA high VFI was associated with an improved survival in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer by enhancing chemotherapy tolerance, reducing adverse events, and increasing the ORR and DCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40603641What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.