ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Simplifying Pharmacokinetics, Applying it to Drug and Dosage Form Development, and Making Drug Dosage Decisions in Clinical Medicine: The Adaptation of Kirchhoff's Laws from Physics.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI is Excellent at the Discovery and Identification of Unrecognized Scientific Knowledge but There Is No Evidence That AI Can Create New Scientific Knowledge.Journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- Mathematical Modeling in Drug Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics: Correct In Vitro, Not Always Valid In Vivo.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Recalling the Definition of Basic Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Avoid Potential Pitfalls.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Net Influx Rather Than Directional Rates: Re-evaluating Transporter Characterization In Vivo and In Vitro for Renal and Hepatic Clearance.The AAPS journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the past three years, we have published a series of nine manuscripts demonstrating that all relevant pharmacokinetic relationships may be simply derived independent of differential equations, offering an alternative to traditional pharmacokinetic analyses. These derivations are based on an understanding of parallel and in series rate-defining processes, and account for all relevant drivers, including organ blood flow and drug delivery clearance kinetics, across both linear and nonlinear scenarios. In this tutorial, we present the simple derivation of renal clearance and hepatic clearance directly relevant to clinical pharmacokinetics, as applied to making drug dosing decisions based on measures of systemic exposure. We further advocate for a more streamlined and practical approach to teaching and applying clinical pharmacokinetics, noting that compartmental modeling, protein binding in hypothetical compartments, trapezoidal AUC calculations, and alternative volume of distribution parameters, aside from (the unfortunately misnamed) volume of distribution steady-state, often overcomplicate pharmacokinetics in practice. The key advantage of this simplified methodology is the ability to directly incorporate clearance from the drug delivery site into systemic pharmacokinetic relationships. This enables a clear understanding of how entering clearance can influence systemic AUC, helping explain: enhanced pharmacodynamic outcomes of slow drug delivery versus immediate-release formulations; systemic bioavailability measures exceeding unity, statistically significant discrepancies between urinary and systemic bioavailability measures; and changes in renal clearance as a function of drug clearance from the delivery site. These key concepts are illustrated by applying the proposed methodology to an example drug, analyzing all relevant clinical pharmacokinetic relationships required for dosing decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.