ArticleScientific reports2025
DASNet a dual branch multi level attention sheep counting network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Grassland sheep counting is essential for both animal husbandry and ecological balance. Accurate population statistics help optimize livestock management and sustain grassland ecosystems. However, traditional counting methods are time-consuming and costly, especially for dense sheep herds. Computer vision offers a cost-effective and labor-efficient alternative, but existing methods still face challenges. Object detection-based counting often leads to overcounts or missed detections, while instance segmentation requires extensive annotation efforts. To better align with the practical task of counting sheep on grasslands, we collected the Sheep1500 UAV Dataset using drones in real-world settings. The varying flight altitudes, diverse scenes, and different density levels captured by the drones endow our dataset with a high degree of diversity. To address the challenge of inaccurate counting caused by background object interference in this dataset, we propose a dual-branch multi-level attention network based on density map regression. DASNet is built on a modified VGG-19 architecture, where a dual-branch structure is employed to integrate both shallow and deep features. A Conv Convolutional Block Attention Layer (CCBL) is incorporated into the network to more effectively focus on sheep regions, alongside a Multi-Level Attention Module (MAM) in the deep feature branch. The MAM, consisting of three Light Channel and Pixel Attention Modules (LCPM), is designed to refine feature representation at both the channel and pixel levels, improving the accuracy of density map generation for sheep counting. In addition, a residual structure connects each module, facilitating feature fusion across different levels and offering increased flexibility in handling diverse information. The LCPM leverages the advantages of attention mechanisms to more effectively extract multi-scale global features of the sheep regions, thereby helping the network to reduce the loss of deep feature information. Experiments conducted on our Sheep1500 UAV Dataset have demonstrated that DASNet significantly outperforms the baseline MAN network, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 3.95 and a Mean Squared Error (MSE) of 4.87, compared to the baseline's MAE of 5.39 and MSE of 6.50. DASNet is shown to be effective in handling challenging scenarios, such as dense flocks and background noise, due to its dual-branch feature enhancement and global multi-level feature fusion. DASNet has shown promising results in accuracy and computational efficiency, making it an ideal solution for practical sheep counting in precision agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.