ArticleScientific reports2025
Appropriate target range of INR and predictive factors of recurrent thrombosis and bleeding in patients with venous thromboembolism on warfarin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Warfarin is the cornerstone of venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment. An appropriate international normalized ratio (INR) range of prothrombin time can prevent recurrent VTE and decrease bleeding risk. This study aimed to identify the appropriate INR range for warfarin therapy and evaluate the predictive factors for recurrent VTE and bleeding events. This study included patients diagnosed with VTE and treated with warfarin. We compared three targets of the therapeutic INR range (1.5-2.5, 2.0-3.0, and 2.5-3.5). Among patients with VTE receiving warfarin, no significant differences in VTE recurrence were observed among the three INR targets. Patients with a target INR of 1.5-2.5 had lower bleeding rates than other groups. Smoking was a significant predictive factor for recurrent VTE. Transiently provoked VTE and active cancer were significant risk factors for bleeding, while the target range of INR 1.5-2.5 with good compliance was a protective factor for bleeding. In summary, a target INR of 1.5-2.5 effectively prevented recurrent VTE with minimal bleeding risk in patients taking warfarin. Smoking increases VTE recurrence risk, highlighting the importance of smoking cessation to reduce thrombotic risk. Shorter anticoagulant duration could balance thrombotic and bleeding risks in patients with transiently provoked VTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.