ArticleScientific reports2025
An improved SMOTE algorithm for enhanced imbalanced data classification by expanding sample generation space.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balanced DNA interpolation improves learning of genetic distance-informed embeddings in plants.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Machine Learning for the Interpretation of Serum Protein and Immunofixation Electrophoresis in Multiple Myeloma: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Prediction of delirium in trauma patients using interpretable machine learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Early identification of major depression risk among reproductive-age women using hormonal contraceptives in southern Ethiopia: A Machine Learning Approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-Stage State Assessment of Breakers Based on TCWGAN-GP and XGBoost Under Insufficient Samples.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A hybrid SMOTE and Gaussian mixture model based optimized XGBoost framework for bipolar disorder detection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A survey on data augmentation for EEG-based emotion recognition and cognitive workload decoding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Letter to the editor "The NPAR index in breast cancer: diagnostic promise versus validation reality".International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Determinants of organ donation knowledge and attitudes among university students in Oman: a secondary analysis using logistic regression and machine learning.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Class imbalance in datasets often degrades the performance of classification models. Although the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) and its variants alleviate this issue by generating synthetic samples, they frequently overlook local density and distribution characteristics. Consequently, developing methods that incorporate local spatial information to synthesize samples that better preserve the original data distribution is critical for improving model robustness in class-imbalanced scenarios. To address this gap, we propose an enhanced SMOTE algorithm (ISMOTE), which modifies the spatial constraints for synthetic sample generation. Unlike SMOTE, the proposed method first generates a base sample between two original samples. Then the Euclidean distance between the two samples is multiplied by a random number to generate a random quantity. This random quantity is added or subtracted based on the distance between the base sample and the original samples, ensuring that new samples are generated around the two original samples. By adaptively expanding the synthetic sample generation space, ISMOTE effectively alleviates distortions in local data distribution and density. This study compared the ISMOTE algorithm with seven mainstream oversampling algorithms, using three classifiers on thirteen public datasets from the KEEL, UCI, and Kaggle databases. Comparative analysis of 2D and 3D scatter plots revealed that ISMOTE yields more realistic data distributions. Experimental results demonstrated relative improvements in classifier performance, with F1-score, G-mean, and AUC increasing by 13.07%, 16.55%, and 7.94%, respectively. Furthermore, ISMOTE's parameter adaptability enables its application to multi-class imbalanced datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.