ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of deep learning models for predictive maintenance in industrial manufacturing systems using sensor data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lightweight Machine Learning Framework for Cavitation Detection in Submersible Pumps Using Experimental Multi-Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A hybrid generative and transformer-based framework for anomaly detection in industrial sensor time-series for predictive maintenance.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Vanilla LSTM Predictive Maintenance Model for Scientific Research Facilities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- LSTM-based early warning system for ceramic firing defects: a time-series approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of deep learning models for predictive maintenance (PdM) in industrial manufacturing systems using sensor data. We propose a framework that encompasses data acquisition, preprocessing, and model construction using various deep learning architectures, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, and their hybrid variants. Experiments conducted on three industrial datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of these models in predicting equipment failures and estimating remaining useful life. The CNN-LSTM hybrid model achieves the best performance with 96.1% accuracy and 95.2% F1-score, outperforming standalone CNN and LSTM architectures. Through ablation studies and feature importance analysis, we identify critical components and parameters that influence model performance. The results highlight the potential of deep learning approaches in revolutionizing predictive maintenance practices by enabling more accurate and reliable fault prediction in industrial manufacturing systems. Our findings provide valuable insights for implementing data-driven predictive maintenance strategies in real-world industrial applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.