ArticleNpj imaging2024
Self-assembled peptide-dye nanostructures for in vivo tumor imaging and photodynamic toxicity.
Article in Npj imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing the Biological Functionality of Hydrogels Using Self-Assembling Peptides.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Introducing npj Imaging: a new journal to serve the bio- and medical imaging communities.Npj imaging · 2024Article
- Research Progress on Cyclic-Peptide Functionalized Nanoparticles for Tumor-Penetrating Delivery.International journal of nanomedicine · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report noncovalent assemblies of iRGD peptides and methylene blue dyes via electrostatic and hydrophobic stacking. These resulting nanomaterials could bind to cancer cells, image them with photoacoustic signal, and then treat them via photodynamic therapy. We first assessed the optical properties and physical properties of the materials. We then evaluated their utility for live cell targeting, in vivo imaging, and in vivo photodynamic toxicity. We tuned the performance of iRGD by adding aspartic acid (DD) or tryptophan doublets (WW) to the peptide to promote electrostatic or hydrophobic stacking with methylene blue, respectively. The iRGD-DD led to 150-nm branched nanoparticles, but iRGD-WW produced 200-nm nano spheres. The branched particles had an absorbance peak that was redshifted to 720 nm suitable for photoacoustic signal. The nanospheres had a peak at 680 nm similar to monomeric methylene blue. Upon continuous irradiation, the nanospheres and branched nanoparticles led to a 116.62% and 94.82% increase in reactive oxygen species in SKOV-3 cells relative to free methylene blue at isomolar concentrations suggesting photodynamic toxicity. Targeted uptake was validated via competitive inhibition. Finally, we used in vivo bioluminescent signal to monitor tumor burden and the effect of for photodynamic therapy: The nanospheres had little impact versus controls (p = 0.089), but the branched nanoparticles slowed SKOV-3 tumor burden by 75.9% (p < 0.05).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.