Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603536›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Post-variational classical quantum transfer learning for binary classification.

Kavitha Yogaraj, Brian Quanz, Tarun Vikas, Arijit Mondal, Samrat Mondal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kavitha YogarajIBM Quantum, IBM Research, Bengaluru, India. kyogarj1@in.ibm.com.
Brian QuanzIBM Quantum, IBM Research, New York, USA.
Tarun VikasDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, India.
Arijit MondalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, India.
Samrat MondalDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We address the limitations of variational quantum circuits (VQCs) in hybrid classical-quantum transfer learning by introducing post-variational strategies, which reduce training overhead and mitigate optimization issues. Our approach Post Variational Classical Quantum Transfer Learning (PVCQTL) includes three designs: (1) modified observable construction, (2) a hybrid approach, and (3) a variational-post-variational combination. We evaluate these on pre-trained models (VGG19, ResNet50, ResNet18, MobileNet) for 4 and 8 qubits, with ResNet50 performing best in deepfake detection. Compared to classical models (MLP, ResNet50) and quantum baselines hybrid quantum classical neural network (HQCNN), classical-quantum transfer learning (CQTL). PVCQTL consistently achieves better accuracy. The modified observable variant reaches 85% accuracy for Deepfake dataset with lower computational cost. To evaluate generalizability, we tested PVCQTL on three additional binary classification datasets, observing improved accuracy on each. We conducted ablation studies to assess the effects of architectural choices on quantum component variations, including the choice of quantum gates, use of fixed ansatz circuits, and observable measurements. Robustness to input noise and sensitivity of the PVCQTL models were examined through ablation studies on learning rate, batch size, and number of qubits. These results demonstrate that PVCQTL offers a measurable improvement over traditional hybrid classical-quantum approaches.

Indexed as

Post variationalQuantum binary classificationQuantum transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID40603536
PMCPMC12222755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.