Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Deep learning-based approach to third molar impaction analysis with clinical classifications.

Yunus Balel, Kaan Sağtaş

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yunus BalelDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey. yunusbalel@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0496-8564
Kaan SağtaşSEMRUK Technology Inc. Cumhuriyet Teknokent, Sivas, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed a deep learning model for the automated detection and classification of impacted third molars using the Pell and Gregory Classification, Winter's Classification, and Pederson Difficulty Index. Panoramic radiographs of patients treated at Sivas Cumhuriyet University between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Impacted teeth were manually classified, and annotations were created using the CVAT software with bounding-box labeling. The dataset included 2,300 images for training, 765 for validation, and 765 for testing, encompassing 7,624 impacted teeth for training, 2,580 for validation, and 2,493 for testing, with 98 unique labels. The YOLOv11 model was trained using optimized hyperparameters (learning rate: 0.01, batch size: 4, up to 1,000 epochs) and data augmentation. Performance metrics included precision (0.980), recall (0.948), F1 score (0.974), mAP@50 (0.990), and mAP@50:95 (0.974). Specific labels, such as 48-Distoangular-C-III (F1: 0.633), exhibited lower F1 scores. The model demonstrated high accuracy and efficiency, addressing the limitations of manual classifications. Enhancing dataset diversity and refining challenging labels could further improve outcomes. This model automates the complex classification of impacted third molars, offering a reliable, efficient decision support system for clinical applications, streamlining workflows, reducing variability, and improving diagnostic precision.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMolar, ThirdTooth, ImpactedFemaleHumansMaleRadiography, PanoramicRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceClassificationDeep learningDetectionImpacted third molar

Identifiers

PMID40603531
PMCPMC12222663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.