ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of biological activities of Agaricus species: an artificial intelligence-assisted approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenolic content and biological activities of Lenzites betulina extracts obtained by ultrasonic-assisted optimization approaches.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Optimization of Hymenopellis radicata extracts using RSM and ANN-GA and evaluation of biological activities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the optimum extraction conditions that maximize the biological activities of Agaricus campestris and Agaricus bisporus species. In the study, a total of 64 extraction experiments were carried out at different temperatures, time and solvent concentrations and the obtained data were modeled with Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and optimized with Genetic Algorithm (GA). After determining the optimum extraction parameters, antioxidant, anticholinesterase and antiproliferative activities and phenolic contents of the produced extracts were analyzed. As a result of single and multi-objective optimization studies of A. campestris and A. bisporus, extract concentration was determined. In antioxidant analyses, it was observed that A. campestris extracts had higher total antioxidant capacity (TAS) and lower total oxidant level (TOS) compared to A. bisporus extracts. Anticholinesterase activity tests revealed that A. campestris extracts showed stronger inhibitory effect compared to A. bisporus. In addition, in the antiproliferative activity analyses performed on the A549 lung cancer cell line, it was determined that the extracts produced with ANN-GA optimization suppressed cell proliferation. Phenolic compound analyses showed that antioxidant compounds such as gallic acid, protocatechuic acid and caffeic acid were found at high levels in A. campestris extracts. The results show that ANN-GA supported optimization processes enrich the bioactive components of mushroom extracts and that these methods may be effective in biotechnological applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.