Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603523›Full record

ArticleNpj imaging2024

Focal cortical dysplasia (type II) detection with multi-modal MRI and a deep-learning framework.

Anand Shankar, Manob Jyoti Saikia, Samarendra Dandapat, Shovan Barma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Npj imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anand ShankarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781015, India.
Manob Jyoti SaikiaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. manob.saikia@unf.edu.
Samarendra DandapatDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
Shovan BarmaDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Indian Institute of Information Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781015, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal cortical dysplasia type II (FCD-II) is a prominent cortical development malformation associated with drug-resistant epileptic seizures that leads to lifelong cognitive impairment. Efficient MRI, followed by its analysis (e.g., cortical abnormality distinction, precise localization assistance, etc.) plays a crucial role in the diagnosis and supervision (e.g., presurgery planning and postoperative care) of FCD-II. Involving machine learning techniques particularly, deep-learning (DL) approaches, could enable more effective analysis techniques. We performed a comprehensive study by choosing six different well-known DL models, three image planes (axial, coronal, and sagittal) of two MRI modalities (T1w and FLAIR), demographic characteristics (age and sex) and clinical characteristics (brain hemisphere and lobes) to identify a suitable DL model for analysing FCD-II. The outcomes show that the DenseNet201 model is more suitable because of its superior classification accuracy, high-precision, F1-score, and large area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision-recall (PR) curve.

Identifiers

PMID40603523
PMCPMC12118680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.