ArticleScientific reports2025
How to improve performance of Chinese BIM-supported civil engineering projects based on the qualitative comparative analysis method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Building information modeling (BIM) demonstrates transformative potential in enhancing productivity within the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Nevertheless, determining how to improve the project performance through diverse BIM application conditions and identifying the performance improvement paths remains a valuable yet underexplored topic. Combined with the four actual application stages of BIM (the embryonic, the development, the stability, and the maturity stage) and five application conditions (BIM personnel training, BIM application points, BIM team building, BIM platform establishment, and BIM standard formulation), this study explores the performance improvement paths for Chinese BIM-supported civil engineering projects using the qualitative comparative analysis method. The findings indicate that none of the five application conditions constitutes a necessary condition for high project performance. The results reveal three configuration paths for enhancing comprehensive and individual performance: the talent-oriented path focusing on BIM personnel training and BIM team building, the technology-oriented path emphasizing BIM standard formulation, BIM platform establishment, and BIM application points, and the integrated path combining the talent-oriented path and the technology-oriented path. This paper not only can help the project stakeholders to allocate resources and improve performance for Chinese BIM-supported civil engineering projects but also provides a reference for government-related policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.