ArticleScientific reports2025
DSF-YOLO for weld defect detection in X-ray images with dynamic staged fusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- YOLO11-Based Weld Defect Detection Method for X-Ray Images Integrating SIoU Bounding Box Regression and P2 Shallow Feature Enhancement.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- X-Ray Weld Image Detection Method of Water Injection Network Based on Sparse Representation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- GSA-YOLO enables high-efficiency real-time X-ray security inspection via structured sparsity and adaptive knowledge distillation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- MGDR-YOLO: An Efficient Multi-Backbone YOLOv11 Framework for X-Ray Weld Defect Inspection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- WELD-DETR: A Real-Time Welding Defect Detection Framework with Multi-Scale Feature Fusion and Multi-Kernel Perception Optimization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Weld defect detection poses significant challenges including ambiguous boundaries, diverse defect shapes, and the requirement for precise localization. To address these issues, we propose DSF-YOLO, a novel framework specifically designed for pipeline weld defect detection. DSF-YOLO introduces three core innovations. The Dynamic Staged Fusion Feature Extraction (DSFFE) module dynamically fuses same-scale features from dual-backbone networks, progressively enhancing the representation of defect features and enabling the model to efficiently capture small-sized defects, blurred boundaries, and complex defect characteristics. The Dual Multi-Scale Feature Fusion (DMFF) module builds on the feature extraction capabilities of DSFFE and employs a dual fusion strategy to effectively aggregate global and local features, enhancing the representation of small targets and improving the separation of blurred boundaries. The decoupled head based on SENetv2-ResNeXt incorporates a multi-channel parallel processing strategy to further strengthen feature representation while inter-channel information interaction and global feature representation significantly improve classification and localization precision. Validated on an X-ray weld defect dataset containing 8 defect types, DSF-YOLO achieved an mAP50:95 of 74.7% surpassing YOLOv8-X by 1.1% and an mAP50 of 99.1% exceeding YOLOv8-X by 0.3%. Additionally, DSF-YOLO significantly reduces computational complexity, achieving a 75% reduction in FLOPs and a 47.5% decrease in parameters compared to YOLOv8-X. These results establish DSF-YOLO as an efficient and accurate solution addressing critical challenges in industrial weld defect detection with significant practical value.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.