ArticleScientific reports2025
Ensemble methods and partially-supervised learning for accurate and robust automatic murine organ segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Delineation of multiple organs in murine µCT images is crucial for preclinical studies but requires manual volumetric segmentation, a tedious and time-consuming process prone to inter-observer variability. Automatic deep learning-based segmentation can improve speed and reproducibility. While 2D and 3D deep learning models have been developed for anatomical segmentation, their generalization to external datasets has not been extensively investigated. Furthermore, ensemble learning, combining predictions of multiple 2D models, and partially-supervised learning (PSL), enabling training on partially-labeled datasets, have not been explored for preclinical purposes. This study demonstrates the first use of PSL frameworks and the superiority of 3D models in accuracy and generalizability to external datasets. Ensemble methods performed on par or better than the best individual 2D network, but only 3D models consistently generalized to external datasets (Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) > 0.8). PSL frameworks showed promising results across various datasets and organs, but its generalization to external data can be improved for some organs. This work highlights the superiority of 3D models over 2D and ensemble counterparts in accuracy and generalizability for murine µCT image segmentation. Additionally, a promising PSL framework is presented for leveraging multiple datasets without complete annotations. Our model can increase time-efficiency and improve reproducibility in preclinical radiotherapy workflows by circumventing manual contouring bottlenecks. Moreover, high segmentation accuracy of 3D models allows monitoring multiple organs over time using repeated µCT imaging, potentially reducing the number of mice sacrificed in studies, adhering to the 3R principle, specifically Reduction and Refinement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.