ArticleScientific reports2025
Modeling student satisfaction in online learning using random forest.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From digital learning readiness to student satisfaction: the mediating role of learning well-being in Saudi higher education.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The rapid expansion of online education has intensified the need to investigate the multifactorial determinants of university students' satisfaction with digital learning platforms. While prior studies have often examined technical or pedagogical components in isolation, limited attention has been paid to their interaction with students' psychological well-being, particularly through nonlinear mechanisms. To address this gap, this study employs a Random Forest-based framework to model satisfaction using a multidimensional dataset from 782 university students. Measured variables included platform usability, content quality, emotional experience, and self-regulation. Data were standardized via Z-scores, and class imbalance was addressed using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE). Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, F1-score, and area under the ROC curve (AUC). Results identified platform stability and content update frequency as the most influential predictors, with AUC values exceeding 0.95 across most satisfaction levels. Psychological factors-especially perceived enjoyment and emotional stability-also contributed significantly. Partial dependence plots revealed threshold and saturation effects, highlighting complex nonlinear patterns missed by traditional linear models. However, performance declined in predicting low-satisfaction cases (AUC = 0.70), likely due to subgroup underrepresentation. This study contributes theoretically by integrating cognitive-affective dimensions, methodologically by demonstrating the utility of machine learning in modeling nonlinear interactions, and practically by providing actionable insights for platform optimization. Future research should incorporate additional psychological constructs, such as cognitive load and resilience, and apply the model across more diverse learner populations to enhance generalizability and support inclusive, user-centered digital education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.