Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603450›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Rootstock microbiome as a target for manipulation to combat apple replant disease.

Svetlana N Yurgel, Nivethika Ajeethan, Shawkat Ali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Svetlana N YurgelGrain Legume Genetics and Physiology Research Unit, USDA, ARS, Prosser, WA, 99350, USA. svetlana.yurgel@usda.gov.
Nivethika AjeethanDepartment of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B2N 5E3, Canada.
Shawkat AliKentville Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Kentville, NS, B4N 1J5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apple replant disease (ARD) describes a phenomenon of reduction of crop productivity in the early years of orchard establishment on sites previously planted with apple. Currently, manipulation of the soil microbiome through (bio)fumigation is the primary approach to alleviate ARD. An alternative approach to combat ARD, could involve adjusting the rootstock microbiome to better cope with biotic stress present in orchard soil. In this study we evaluated differences in microbiome structure and composition between nursery grown rootstock and mature apple trees, cultivated in Nova Scotian orchards. We found that mature apple tree roots associated microbiome dramatically differed in its diversity, structure and composition compared to that associated with saplings. Our research identified several fungal and bacterial taxa as potential candidates for further study in the context of nursery inoculation and their possible role in mitigating ARD in re-planted apple orchards. The results of this study provide a foundation for development of a synthetic community which could be used in nurseries during rootstock propagation to improve saplings adaptation to ARD soils. This approach may offer an ecologically safe and cost-effective alternative to current soil amendments to alleviate ARD consequences.

Indexed as

MalusMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesPlant RootsBacteriaFungiSoil MicrobiologyApple replant diseaseApple rootstockBacterial microbial communitiesFungal microbial communities

Identifiers

PMID40603450
PMCPMC12222655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.