ArticleScientific reports2025
The role of oceanographic scales in shaping highly mobile marine predator distributions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marine animals live in a dynamic environment, where a wide range of drivers and processes impact their movements and distributions. These processes occur over multiple spatio-temporal scales, from fine scale phytoplankton blooms and zooplankton patches to larger scale climatic events such as El Niño or climate change. In a dynamic ocean, the predictability of ocean features and processes vary across multiple scales. Marine animals interact with all these processes, and they all have the potential to impact animal distribution. However, which processes and scales predominantly predict the distributions of highly mobile predators is currently unknown. Here, we use electronic tagging data (265 sharks tagged in the Pacific) to investigate the scales of environmental selection of three pelagic shark species (the salmon shark Lamna ditropis, the blue shark Prionace glauca, and the shortfin mako Isurus oxyrinchus) across an array of spatio-temporal resolutions (from 9 km - 1 day to 500 km - climatology) for both Eulerian and Lagrangian variables. While Eulerian and Lagrangian variables at all scales tested have predictive power, we find that the 100 km - 1 year scale best predicted predator locations, indicating that larger scale, annually averaged signals outperform the other scales in predicting predator location.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.