ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the closures of sea level budgets in China's adjacent seas.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Regional relative sea level changes are most relevant for coastal communities and remain challenging to understand. China's adjacent seas are among the world's most vulnerable regions to sea level rise. This paper investigates the sea level budgets in China's adjacent seas over the past 20 years. We use multiple time-varying gravity field data and steric data to assess the uncertainties of some components in the sea level budget and the contributions of mass loss from ice sheets, glaciers, and terrestrial water storage changes to regional relative sea level changes were estimated using sea level fingerprints. The sea level budget results based on ensemble mean data show that the root mean square errors of the budget residuals in the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea, and Northwest Pacific are 40±3 mm, 52±4 mm, 36±2 mm, 23±2 mm, and 11±1 mm, respectively. A single dataset fails to close the long-term sea level trends for all regions within a 65% confidence interval. We discussed the impacts of each component on the budget residuals and identified steric data and the ocean dynamics model as the main reasons for the excessive residuals. The de-aliasing product of the GRACE satellite, AOD1B model, is primarily responsible for the strong interannual signals in the residuals of the sea level budget in the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.