Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603414›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Stakeholder perceptions of tourism's impacts on the ecological environment of island destinations based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fei Shang, Hong Ching Goh, Muhammad Mehedi Masud

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fei ShangInstitute for Advanced Studies, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Hong Ching GohDepartment of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. gohhc@um.edu.my.
Muhammad Mehedi MasudDepartment of Political Science, Public Administration and Development Studies, Faculty of Business and Economics, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. mehedi@um.edu.my.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding stakeholders' perceptions is crucial for balancing tourism growth with ecological sustainability in island destinations characterized by fragile environments and limited resources. This study intends to update and synthesize knowledge through a systematic review and meta-analysis on stakeholders' perceived ecological impacts of island tourism. Both thematic analysis and content analysis were conducted to categorize and synthesize themes in the selected literature. The findings reveal that key stakeholders-including residents, tourists, operators, and officials-express concerns about the environmental impacts of tourism, with negative perceptions outweighing positive ones. They note negative effects such as pollution, resource depletion, and species destruction, as well as positive outcomes like increased environmental awareness and improved infrastructure. Additionally, the study further outlines three key management strategies: Enhancing stakeholder participation, adopting adaptive strategies and regulations, and strengthening long-term monitoring and evaluation systems. Finally, this study presents a conceptual framework that connects stakeholder perceptions with management responses, aiming to assess the ecological impacts of tourism on island environments. By integrating diverse stakeholder perspectives, this study advances the discourse on insular ecological conservation and tourism governance, providing valuable insights for more effective and sustainable development strategies.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemStakeholder ParticipationTourismHumansIslandsPerceptionEcological environmentIsland destinationsMeta-analysisStakeholder perceptionsSystematic reviewTourism

Identifiers

PMID40603414
PMCPMC12223206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.