Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603398›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Influence of cognitive networks and task performance on fMRI-based state classification using DNN models.

Murat Kucukosmanoglu, Javier O Garcia, Justin Brooks, Kanika Bansal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Murat KucukosmanogluD-Prime LLC, McLean, VA, 22101, USA.
Javier O GarciaHumans in Complex Systems, US Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA.
Justin BrooksD-Prime LLC, McLean, VA, 22101, USA.
Kanika BansalHumans in Complex Systems, US Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, 21005, USA. phy.kanika@gmail.com.

Funding

US Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory W911NF2120108US Army DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory W911SR-15-2-0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs) excel at extracting insights from complex data across various fields, however, their application in cognitive neuroscience remains limited, largely due to the lack of approaches with interpretability. Here, we employ two different and complementary DNN models, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and a bidirectional long short-term memory network (BiLSTM), to classify cognitive task states from fMRI data, focusing on the cognitive underpinnings of the classification. The 1D-CNN achieved an overall accuracy of 81% (Macro AUC = 0.96), while the BiLSTM reached 78% (Macro AUC = 0.95). Despite the architectural differences, both models demonstrated a robust relationship between prediction accuracy and individual cognitive performance (p < 0.05 for 1D-CNN, and p < 0.001 for BiLSTM), with lower classification accuracy observed in individuals with poorer task performance. Feature importance analysis highlighted the dominance of visual networks, suggesting that task-driven state differences are primarily encoded in visual processing. Attention and control networks also showed relatively high importance. We observed individual trait-based effects and subtle model-specific differences: 1D-CNN yielded slightly better overall performance, while BiLSTM showed better sensitivity for individual behavior. This study highlights the application of interpretable DNNs in revealing cognitive mechanisms associated with task performance and individual variability.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerTask Performance and AnalysisAdultFemaleHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleYoung AdultBrain networksCognitive state classificationDeep neural networksExplainable AIFeature importance

Identifiers

PMID40603398
PMCPMC12222959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.