Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603387›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Feasibility of blood self-sampling with HemaSpot HF for Anti-Clostridium tetani Toxin IgG detection.

R Kettlitz, J Ortmann, T Kerrinnes, J J Ott, S Castell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R KettlitzDepartment for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany.
J OrtmannDepartment for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany.
T KerrinnesHelmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HZI), Helmholtz Institute for RNA-Based Infection Research (HIRI), Wuerzburg, Germany.
J J OttDepartment for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany.
S CastellDepartment for Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany. Stefanie.Castell@helmholtz-hzi.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health research in humans often requires biosamples, e.g. blood. However, collecting venous blood samples poses multiple logistic challenges and needs to be carried by practitioners at study centres. Using self-collected samples of dried blood spots is an attractive alternative, but its feasibility remains to be determined. We investigated the feasibility (including acceptance) of a self-sampling device called HemaSpot HF (HS) employing the use case of anti-Clostridium tetani toxin IgG detection among 154 volunteers. Of those, n = 49 underwent an additional venous blood puncture (VBP) by medical staff (gold standard) as and control for user errors, which were determined by adding serum on HS filter paper (HemaForm (HF)). Antibody concentrations were analysed via ELISA and the serological status was determined using different cut-off values (COV). Most participants (85%) found the self-sampling using the HS device (fully) acceptable. Sensitivity for HS ranged from 70% (95% CI 0.55; 0.83; COV: 1.0 lU/mL) to 100% (95% CI 0.93; 1.00; COV: 0.01 and 0.1 lU/mL), and for HF 85% (95% CI 0.72; 0.94; 1.0 lU/mL) to 100% (95% CI 0.93; 1.00; COV: 0.01 and 0.1 lU/mL). The correlation between HS and VBP was r

Indexed as

Antibodies, BacterialBlood Specimen CollectionDried Blood Spot TestingImmunoglobulin GAdultAgedEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID40603387
PMCPMC12223160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.