ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of the maximum standardized uptake value and magnetic resonance imaging characteristics between temporomandibular joint osteoarthrosis and osteoarthritis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OAI) and osteoarthrosis (OAO) are subsets of degenerative joint diseases affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), distinguished by the presence of joint pain. However, clinical diagnosis based on pain alone is challenging. This study aimed to differentiate OAI from OAO using imaging modalities, including single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT-CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Data from 65 patients (98 joints) who underwent MRI and SPECT-CT between January 2017 and December 2022 at Gangnam Severance Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the OAI and OAO groups based on the presence of TMJ pain and bony changes on MRI. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to identify significant risk factors for two diseases. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on SPECT-CT and disc shape on MRI were significantly different between the groups. Combining these two variables provided the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.889) compared with SUVmax or disc shape alone (AUC = 0.846 and AUC = 0.752, respectively). There was significant difference in AUC between disc shape and SUVmax + disc shape (p = 0.023). These findings suggest that the combination of SPECT-CT and MRI findings improves the differentiation between OAI and OAO.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.