ArticleScientific reports2025
The impact of team quality, match outcomes, and match location on pitch-passing networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial characteristics of pitch-passing networks under four situational variables in the UEFA Women's euro 2025: a social network analysis.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigated the impact of situational factors (team quality, match outcomes, and match location) on pitch-passing networks in the English Premier League. We analysed 295,901 possessions across 380 matches using a 7 × 7 grid system. For each pitch-passing network we calculated the degree centrality, the closeness centrality, and the betweenness centrality. A Mann-Whitney U test was employed to examine differences in these centrality measures across situational factors. Results indicated that strong teams demonstrated significantly higher degree centrality in midfield and centre-to-forward zones, and maintained superior closeness centrality across the pitch, particularly in central zones, while weak teams showed higher betweenness centrality on pitch flanks. Winning teams exhibited small differences in degree and closeness centrality across multiple zones, with notably medium differences in forward areas, and stronger closeness centrality throughout the pitch. At the same time, home teams demonstrated dominance in forward areas through degree centrality, while away teams showed higher activity in defensive baseline zones. Consequently, these findings demonstrate the systematic influences of situational factors on spatial passing patterns, providing empirical evidence for tactical adaptation. Coaches can leverage these insights to optimise passing strategies in critical areas such as midfield and forward zones to enhance offensive efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.