Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603358›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhanced secretary bird optimization algorithm with multi-strategy fusion and Cauchy-Gaussian crossover.

Xinle Wang, Peijun Wei, Yancang Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinle WangSchool of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056038, Hebei, China.
Peijun WeiSchool of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056038, Hebei, China.
Yancang LiSchool of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan, 056038, Hebei, China. liyancang@hebeu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 52278171Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province E2020402079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To address the issues of low convergence accuracy and susceptibility to local optima in the Secretary Bird Optimization Algorithm (SBOA), this paper proposes an improved algorithm (UTFSBOA) that integrates multi-strategy collaboration and Cauchy-Gaussian crossover. The algorithm introduces three innovative mechanisms. First, it incorporates an adaptive nonlinear factor-based directional search mechanism to enhance global exploration. Second, it uses an exponentially decaying energy escape factor inspired by Harris Hawk Optimization (HHO) to balance exploration and exploitation. Third, it includes a Cauchy-Gaussian crossover strategy to enrich solution diversity and prevent premature convergence. Experimental evaluations on the CEC2005 benchmark functions demonstrate that UTFSBOA achieves 81.18% and 88.22% improvements in average convergence accuracy over SBOA in 30-dimensional and 100-dimensional scenarios, respectively. Among 12 complex functions in the CEC2022 test set, the proposed algorithm obtains optimal solutions for 7 functions. Statistical validation via Wilcoxon rank-sum and Friedman tests confirms its robustness. Validation through four real-world engineering problems further confirms its superiority in constrained and discrete optimization scenarios, with objective function improvements reaching up to 91.3%. The results prove that multi-strategy synergy significantly enhances algorithmic robustness in high-dimensional complex spaces, establishing UTFSBOA as an effective solution for constrained and discrete optimization challenges.

Indexed as

Adaptive factorCauchy–Gaussian crossoverDirectional search strategyEnergy escape factorSecretary bird optimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID40603358
PMCPMC12223234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.