ArticleScientific reports2025
Race-neutral versus race-specific GLI reference equations on spirometry interpretation in the general population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic outcomes of the 2023 race-neutral and 2012 race-specific global lung function initiative spirometry equations in healthy Algerian adults: a cross-sectional comparative analysis.The Libyan journal of medicine · 2026Article
- Race-neutral lung function equations and clinical interpretation in East Asian patients.Internal medicine journal · 2026Article
- Race-neutral Global Lung Function Initiative 2022 equations alter COPD trial eligibility in a northeast Asian COPD cohort.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Impact of Transitioning from Race-Specific to Race-Neutral GLI Equation on Lung Function in a Predominantly Caucasian Population.Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary function interpretation is key to the diagnosis and management of respiratory diseases. The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) introduced the race-specific reference equations for spirometry in 2012, with subsequent development of the race-neutral reference equations in 2022. This study examined the effects of transitioning from the race-specific 2012-GLI to the race-neutral 2022-GLI reference equations on spirometry interpretation in Northeast Asians. Spirometric data of 10,030 adults from the KoGES cohort were used to derive percent-predicted values using both GLI reference equations. The prevalence of lung function impairment and medical disability, associations of FEV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.