Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603336›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mental health trajectories, resilience and psychosocial factors in palliative care workers frequently exposed to death.

Isabelle Cuchet, Axelle Maneval, Michael Dambrun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Isabelle CuchetLaboratory of Social and COgnitive Psychology (LAPSCO), UMR CNRS 6024, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France. isabelle.cuchet@doctorant.uca.fr.
Axelle ManevalUR ACCePPT, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France.
Michael DambrunLaboratory of Social and COgnitive Psychology (LAPSCO), UMR CNRS 6024, University Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Palliative care (PC) professionals are constantly exposed to patients' suffering and death-potentially traumatic events (PTEs) that are in addition to everyday work and personal stressors. The long-term mental health effects of these experiences are unclear. Additionally, psychosocial factors such as social support, autonomy, psychological demands, empathy, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, and self-compassion have not been studied over the long term among these professionals. This six-month longitudinal study aimed to chart mental health trajectories in palliative care professionals. An online questionnaire was administered twice-November 2022 (t1) and May 2023 (t2)-to PC professionals in France (e.g. doctors, nurses, care assistants, psychologists). Of the initial 379 participants at t1, 280 completed both surveys, resulting in a 26% attrition rate. Chronic stress from ongoing end-of-life care was the strongest predictor of mental health between t1 and t2. Participants followed one of two trajectories: a resilience trajectory (63.21-68.93%) or a chronic distress trajectory (approximately 31.07-36.79%). Among all psychosocial factors measured, higher psychological flexibility significantly increased the odds of a resilience trajectory, as shown by associations with both burnout and well-being scores. Similarly, mindfulness and self-compassion are resilience factors on anxiety and depression scores.

Indexed as

DeathHealth PersonnelMental HealthPalliative CareResilience, PsychologicalAdultBurnout, ProfessionalDepressionFemaleFranceHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedSocial SupportStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID40603336
PMCPMC12222895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.