ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical relevance of the somatic mutational landscaping in predicting outcome of bladder cancer patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiotherapy for High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Review
- Urogenital Cancers: New Molecular and Translational Aspects on Carcinogenesis and Treatments.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) displays a huge phenotypic variation and widespread clinical outcomes, attributed to the high mutational heterogeneity of the disease. Mutational landscaping became integral to cancer patient management as it unveils driver genes and yields genotype-phenotype associations. This study aims to identify somatic mutations, their frequencies and their associations with clinical and prognostic outcomes in BC. Eighty-one BC patients were analyzed by next-generation sequencing using the Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspots Panel v2. Bioinformatics analysis, correlation studies and Kaplan-Meier curve were used to evaluate the relationship between genes' mutational status and patients' clinical parameters and outcomes. Our results indicated that the BC cohort exhibited a higher mutation burden than the TCGA data. Mutations were identified in 46 out of 50 genes, including 21 novel mutations not previously reported in BC. The TP53 gene was mutated in 82.5% of the analyzed cohort, followed by PIK3 CA (45%), FGFR3 (43.75%) and APC (35%). TP53 mutations were associated with poor survival (p = 0.003) while the FGFR3 mutation group exhibited signs of good prognosis (p = 0.018). Bioinformatics highlighted significant gene interactions associated with poor prognosis. These findings underline the importance of identifying novel genetic mutations that could significantly improve prognostic stratification and expand therapeutic options for managing BC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.