ArticleScientific reports2025
Partner familiarity enhances performance in a manual precision task.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding human collaborative behavior in tasks with physical interaction is essential for advancing physical human-robot collaboration. Investigating how individuals learn to collaborate over repeated interactions can provide valuable insights for developing robotic agents capable of gradually improving coordination and collaboration performance. Therefore, this study investigated learning behavior in a high-precision task over repeated haptic collaboration. Specifically, we examined if learned collaboration behavior is partner-specific, what collaboration strategies are developed, and if interpersonal differences affect collaboration. Our results indicate that repeated physical collaboration with the same partner allowed for immediate high performance with a familiar partner in subsequent collaborations, whereas adapting to an unfamiliar partner required retraining. Participants used partner-specific collaboration behaviors-in terms of motions and forces-that could be retained in subsequent interactions. Collaborators reduced the variability of their arm motions over repeated collaboration, achieving higher performance, likely due to increased predictability. Collaboration also enabled knowledge transfer between partners, with individual improvement being enhanced when paired with a better-performing partner. These findings suggest that partners in a collaborative precision task optimize their performance by gradually negotiating a joint action strategy, which is reused in subsequent collaborations with familiar partners and carries over to solo task execution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.