ArticleScientific reports2025
Domain-specific osmoadaptation revealed by metatranscriptomic analysis in hypersaline environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salinity-driven microbial adaptation of hydrocarbon-degrading communities in coastal sediments.mSphere · 2026Article
- Ecological plasticity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Asymmetric Osmoadaptive Responses in Intermediate-Salinity Microbial Communities Revealed by Metatranscriptomics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Decoding extremophiles: insights from bioinformatics, machine learning, and data-driven approaches.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput RNA-seq enables the analysis of gene expression in complex, culture-independent microbial communities. In this study, we used this approach to explore the microbial adaptation to salinity changes in hypersaline environments using samples collected from the Santa Pola ponds (Alicante, Spain). Two metatranscriptomic experiments were conducted: (i) salt concentration from 20 to 30%, mimicking summer evaporation, and (ii) dilution from 30 to 25%, simulating rainfall. As a result, these two experiments revealed significant differences in the gene expression of several metabolic pathways and essential processes, revealing different adaptation strategies between Archaea and Bacteria. Under saline concentration, most bacterial taxa, excluding Salinibacter, exhibited higher transcriptional repression compared to Archaea, suggesting an energy conservation response to osmotic stress. In contrast, Archaea maintained metabolic activity, with Haloquadratum showing more gene induction than repression, allowing for osmoadaptation. Conversely, in the dilution experiment, Archaea displayed greater transcriptional plasticity than Bacteria, reflecting their ability to dynamically adapt to fluctuating salinity. Further, metatranscriptomics coupled with the analysis of isoelectric point (pI) distributions revealed a remarkable repression of high-pI predicted proteins under high-salt concentration, particularly in Bacteria, suggesting a selective downregulation of basic proteins in response to osmotic stress and highlighting a potential adaptive mechanism. Overall, these findings underscore domain-specific osmoadaptation strategies to cope with osmotic stress in hypersaline environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.