ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2025
New genetic diagnoses for inherited retinal dystrophies by integrating splicing tools into NGS pipelines.
Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- First Exonic Cryptic Branchpoint Variant in an Inherited Retinal Degeneration Detected in an IrishGenes · 2026Article
- Genetic Testing in Inherited Retinal Disease: Current Strategies and Future Directions.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Functional Validation of a Novel Deep IntronicThe application of clinical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variants affecting pre-mRNA splicing mechanisms are responsible for multiple monogenic disorders. However, their prioritization and interpretation remain challenging. Herein, we designed a strategy for the identification of likely spliceogenic variants in unsolved inherited retinal dystrophy (IRD) cases. We benchmarked thirteen splicing predictors on a curated training dataset, which revealed that the combination of SpliceAI and MaxEnt tools exhibited the best performance for the analysis of most splicing variants. However, for branch point variants, the BranchPoint tool (Alamut®-Batch) was the optimal choice. The proposed combination of tools was assessed using a validation cohort comprising 116 genetically diagnosed individuals with rare diseases, and subsequently applied for the analysis of 211 unsolved IRD families. The pipeline identified 30 likely pathogenic variants, 17 of which were predicted to alter splicing mechanisms. These results demonstrate an increase in diagnostic yield of up to 6.2%, reinforcing the importance of reanalysis strategies focused on identifying spliceogenic variants.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.