ArticleNature communications2025
Prioritizing perturbation-responsive gene patterns using interpretable deep learning.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatially organized regulated cell death-immune coupling in solid tumors: integrating spatial omics with actionable regulated cell death biology.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Scoring gene importance by interpreting single-cell foundation models.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Interpretation, extrapolation and perturbation of single cells.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- CONCERT predicts niche-aware perturbation responses in spatial transcriptomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spatially resolved transcriptomics enables mapping of multiplexed gene expression within tissue contexts. While existing methods prioritize spatially variable genes within a single slice, few address identifying genes with differential spatial expression patterns (DSEPs) across multiple conditions-an critical need for complex experimental designs. Challenges include modeling cross-slice spatial variation, scalability to large datasets, and disentangling inter-slice heterogeneity. We introduce DSEP gene prioritization as a new analytical task and present River, an interpretable deep learning framework that identifies genes exhibiting condition-relevant spatial changes. River features a two-branch predictive architecture and a post hoc attribution strategy to rank genes (or other features) by their contribution to condition differences. Its spatially-informed modeling ensures scalability to large spatial datasets, and we further decouple spatial and non-spatial components to enhance interpretability. We evaluate River on simulations and apply it to diverse biological contexts, including embryogenesis, diabetes-affected spermatogenesis, and lupus-associated splenic changes. In triple-negative breast cancer, River prioritizes survival-associated spatial patterns that generalize across patients. River is distribution-agnostic and compatible with diverse spatial data types, offering a flexible and scalable solution for analyzing tissue-wide expression dynamics across multiple biological conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.