ArticleNature communications2025
On convex decision regions in deep network representations.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current work on human-machine alignment aims at understanding machine-learned latent spaces and their relations to human representations. We study the convexity of concept regions in machine-learned latent spaces, inspired by Gärdenfors' conceptual spaces. In cognitive science, convexity is found to support generalization, few-shot learning, and interpersonal alignment. We develop tools to measure convexity in sampled data and evaluate it across layers of state-of-the-art deep networks. We show that convexity is robust to relevant latent space transformations and, hence, meaningful as a quality of machine-learned latent spaces. We find pervasive approximate convexity across domains, including image, text, audio, human activity, and medical data. Fine-tuning generally increases convexity, and the level of convexity of class label regions in pretrained models predicts subsequent fine-tuning performance. Our framework allows investigation of layered latent representations and offers new insights into learning mechanisms, human-machine alignment, and potential improvements in model generalization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.