ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2025
Deep brain stimulation is well tolerated and effective following ProSavin® gene therapy for Parkinson's disease.
Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder initially treated with oral dopaminergic medications. When motor fluctuations and side effects develop on these treatments, Deep Brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is used. Striatal dopamine replacement, using a lentiviral vector-based gene therapy (GT), was previously shown to be well-tolerated, leading to clinical improvement in motor function. Later, some of these patients showed evidence of disease progression and were proposed DBS since new GT injection was not yet authorized by regulatory authorities. The tolerance and motor efficacy of DBS in this cohort is reported. Eight patients who had previously received GT (GT/DBS group), were evaluated pre- and 12 months-post DBS. A control group of 84 PD patients who had received DBS, were used for comparison (DBS group). Patients in the GT/DBS group were administered DBS significantly later after PD diagnosis than the DBS group (19.6 vs 12.1 years). Similar rate of serious adverse events, UPDRS III MEDSOFF scores 12 months post-DBS and reduction in LEDD between baseline DBS and 12 months post DBS were reported in both groups. The decrease in axial scores from UPDRS III MEDSOFF/STIMON at 12 months post-DBS compared with baseline DBS was significantly greater in the GT/DBS group than in the DBS group. DBS of the STN was as effective and well-tolerated in GT/DBS PD patients as in the DBS group, even when administered later in their disease course.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.