ArticleJournal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society2025
Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor prescription in lung transplant recipients with cystic fibrosis in the US.
Article in Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) has dramatically improved pulmonary and extrapulmonary manifestations of cystic fibrosis (CF). ETI clinical trials excluded lung transplant (LTx) recipients and current post-transplant prescribing practices are not evidence-based. We sought to identify the prevalence of new ETI prescriptions among CF LTx recipients in the United States (U.S.) and factors associated with ETI prescription after LTx.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cross-sectional study of LTx recipients through December 2022 using the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Patient Registry. Recipients were alive as of October 2019, had an ETI-eligible genotype, and were not prescribed ETI before LTx. Logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with ETI prescription. CF Center prescribing patterns were categorized based on the proportion of LTx recipients who were prescribed ETI after LTx at each center.
resultsOverall, 488/1666 (29.3 %) of patients were prescribed ETI after LTx. The presence of sinus disease (OR 2.12, 95 % CI 1.51-2.99) and BMI<18.5 kg/m
conclusionsETI was newly prescribed to almost 30 % of eligible LTx recipients in the U.S. Even when including patient clinical characteristics in the model, CF center prescribing pattern was one of the strongest factors associated with ETI prescription after LTx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.