Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40603007›Full record

ArticleThe clinical respiratory journal2025

Exploring the Causal Relationship Between Antidepressant Use and Lung Cancer Risk: A Mendelian Randomization Analysis.

Chunli Yang, Wenlin Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chunli YangDepartment of Central Laboratory, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Wenlin XuDepartment of Central Laboratory, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5041-6384

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe dramatic increase in antidepressant prescribing over the past decade has sparked debate about the possible contribution of antidepressants to elevated cancer risk. In this study, we investigate whether antidepressant use has a causal relationship with lung cancer risk.

methodsGenome-wide association study (GWAS) data for antidepressant use were acquired from the FinnGen Biobank, while GWAS data for overall lung cancer and specific histological subtypes were obtained from the UK Biobank (UKBB) and IEU databases. The causal impact was evaluated using inverse variance weighting (IVW), MR-Egger regression, and weighted median (WM) approaches. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the findings. Results are expressed as ORs and 95% CIs.

resultsNo causal relationship between antidepressant use and lung cancer risk was observed in the IVW (OR = 1.001, 95% CI = 0.999, p = 0.279), MR-Egger (OR = 1.002, 95% CI = 0.992, p = 0.700), and WM analyses (OR = 1.000, 95% CI: 0.997, p = 0.889). Similar results were found across lung cancer subtypes, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) (OR = 1.197, 95% CI = 0.884-1.619, p = 0.247), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) (OR = 1.052, 95% CI = 0.822, p = 0.688), and small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) (OR = 1.874, 95% CI = 0.737, p = 0.187). Sensitivity tests confirmed the robustness of these results.

conclusionsThis analysis indicates antidepressant use is not significantly associated with lung cancer risk.

Indexed as

Antidepressive AgentsDepressionLung NeoplasmsMendelian Randomization AnalysisAgedFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsUnited KingdomAntidepressive Agentsantidepressantcausal inferencegenome‐wide association studylung cancer riskMendelian randomization

Identifiers

PMID40603007
PMCPMC12221478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.