Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40602806›Full record

ArticleRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2025

Post

Megan L Rolfzen, Karan Shah, Emelind Sanchez Rodriguez, Julie T Hoffman, Daniel Clauw, Edward Mascha, Veena Graff, Karsten Bartels

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05221866 (Efficiency And Quality In Post-Surgical Pain Therapy After Discharge), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05221866 nacompletednot on this map

Efficiency And Quality In Post-Surgical Pain Therapy After Discharge

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2022 to 2023Enrolled711ConditionsOpioid Use, Opioid Dependence, Opioid Misuse, Post-Surgical ComplicationArmsEmpowering Patient to Steer Their Pain Management After Surgery, Provider-facing Prescription Aid
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Megan L RolfzenAnesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-1393
Karan ShahQuantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Emelind Sanchez RodriguezAnesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Julie T HoffmanAnesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Daniel ClauwAnesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Edward MaschaQuantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Veena GraffAnesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Karsten BartelsAnesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA kbartels@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2028-4664

Funding

Leveraging Alcohol Use Disorder Screening for Treatment in Routine Perioperative Care: AllUsCareR34AA031020 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Karsten Bartels, Anne Christie Fernandez · 2024 to 2026
$759k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS027795NIAAA NIH HHS R34 AA031020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExcess postoperative opioid use is harmful. We tested the hypothesis that a patient-facing educational smartphone app would permit surgical patients to effectively manage their pain while using fewer opioids after discharge.

methodsA two-hospital, single-health system trial randomly exposed adult surgical inpatients to a consumer electronic health app ("educational app") that provided pain education or to a data collection only app ("control app"). During the second half of the trial, a clinician-facing electronic decision-support tool was activated. Linear regression models with log-transformed outcomes estimated the effect of the educational app on the primary outcome of cumulative self-reported opioid use within 4 weeks after discharge (in morphine milligram equivalents (MME)) and the secondary outcome of opioids prescribed at discharge.

resultsWe enrolled 711 patients from May 2, 2022, to December 10, 2023. The modified intention-to-treat analysis cohort included 606 patients, with 303 randomized to the educational app and 303 to the control app. Median (first quartile, third quartile) discharge opioids prescribed to both groups were 75 (60, 150) MME. Median (Q1, Q3) self-reported cumulative opioid use in the 4 weeks after discharge was 22 (0, 98) MME with the educational app and 15 (0, 82) MME with the control app (ratio of geometric means: 1.21; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.69; p=0.264). The use of the clinician-facing electronic decision-support tool also did not modify opioid consumption.

conclusionsNeither a patient-facing educational app nor a clinician-facing decision support tool reduced self-reported opioid consumption among surgical patients with low post-discharge opioid requirements. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05221866.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidOutcome Assessment, Health CarePain, PostoperativeTECHNOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID40602806
PMCPMC12697293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.