ArticleBone & joint open2025
Impact of pubic cut position on pubic root displacement in periacetabular osteotomy : a 3D CT simulation study.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Learning curve in periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip : a systematic review and meta-analysis.Bone & joint open · 2026Pooled it
- Does travel distance influence short-term outcome after periacetabular osteotomy?-A cohort study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Rising star editorial: Periacetabular osteotomy-Reliable outcome and expanding indications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Increased correction of lateral centre edge angle after periacetabular osteotomy is associated with a reduction in hip flexion and internal rotation: A three-dimensional computed tomography simulation study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) has become widely recognized as the gold standard for the correction of acetabular pathomorphologies. However, the pubic cut has raised concerns due to complications such as delayed union and its association with anterior hip syndrome. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of the position of the pubic cut on the displacement of the pubic root during PAO surgery. Methods: The study included thin-sliced CT scans of 58 hips with symptomatic hip dysplasia. Overall, 3D simulations of PAO were performed in triplicate, incorporating three variations of the pubic cut, specifically positioned 5, 10, or 15 mm medial to the iliopectineal eminence. Full displacement of the pubic osteotomy was noted by two independent investigators. Analysis of variance was used for comparison between means. Logistic regression was used to determine factors influencing displacement of the pubic root. Results: The incidence of complete pubic bone displacement increased with the medial position of the cut, with rates of 17.24% for a 5 mm cut, 36.21% for a 10 mm cut, and the highest at 82.76% for a 15 mm cut medial to the iliopectineal eminence (p < 0.001). The odds of complete displacement were reduced ten-fold with a lateral 5 mm pubic cut (odds ratio 0.1, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.20, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The position of the pubic cut is the most significant determinant of pubic root displacement in PAO surgery. Loss of contact at the pubic osteotomy is likely associated with delayed union and postoperative anterior hip syndrome. Choosing a lateral pubic cut positioned 5 mm medial to the iliopectineal eminence is expected to result in a ten-fold reduction in the risk of complete pubic bone displacement. Appreciating the results of this study when performing the pubic cut may help mitigate the risk of post-PAO anterior hip syndrome.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.